Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tara Eve's avatar

Thank you for this informative read. I do hope that before we push forward, that the lessons from Section 230 are heeded. Meaning there will likely need to be:

- An offramp once the growth is sustainable

- Pathways for accountability which are clean and clear

The legislative branch should naturally be supporting American innovation.

Also, if we are going to be speaking about education, then is it valuable to ensure that crypto developers are educated to mitigate legal issues in the first place?

The CryptoJitt Brief's avatar

Developer liability is the sleeper issue in this whole debate. While everyone watches the stablecoin and market-structure fights, whether writing open-source code makes you a money transmitter is what actually decides if builders stay onshore. A PAC funding that specific fight is smarter than another broad pro-crypto push. The Tornado Cash precedent still hangs over every protocol dev's head.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?